Why alternatives to the MFCC Proposal are needed.

The MFCC, because it relies on including so much acreage

(ten times as much as required) proposes to rezone

existing Carlisle neighborhoods. However, other alternatives, including selecting one approximately six and one-third acre site, would better protect the unique and special character of Carlisle.

 

Carlisle is unique because of its abundance of nature, its mix of wooded and agricultural areas, and its long-standing commitment to preserving historic and natural vistas. Other alternatives, such as selecting one concentrated area, will better achieve the goals of the MBTA legislation, including encouraging public transit and facilitating economies of scale.

 

Carlisle's existing neighborhoods lack infrastructure and suitable roads.  Many are served by private roads and/or narrow and scenic roads.  Spreading the MBTA Communities development across town on the existing road network will increase traffic and use of automobiles. Other alternatives may lead to development of improved public transportation options.  

 

Finally, the MFCC plan appears to rely on utilizing existing septic, water, and storm water infrastructure, with the attendant risk that these systems may become over-burdened, while other options, such as choosing a six and one-third acre site, increase the likelihood that new infrastructure will be built to support any new development.  

 

Preventing groundwater contamination and ensuring an adequate supply of drinking water should be of paramount importance to the Town.  Choosing a smaller site would allow the Town to carry out water testing prior to rezoning, whereas the greater amount of acreage proposed for the MFCC plan may render it economically and practically infeasible to perform water testing.